PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) and XDGH.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares. XEQT.TO is actively managed, while XDGH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XEQT.TO returned 13.90%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for XDGH.TO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEQT.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for XDGH.TO.

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than XDGH.TO's 7.78% return.

XEQT.TO

1D
0.83%
1M
6.02%
YTD
13.22%
6M
11.68%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
—

XDGH.TO

1D
0.58%
1M
1.83%
YTD
7.78%
6M
9.10%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
13.27%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		13.22%19.47%24.36%17.25%-11.01%18.94%11.82%9.89%
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		7.78%14.60%10.46%8.74%-1.32%15.60%-4.34%12.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and XDGH.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019

0.58

The correlation between XEQT.TO and XDGH.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XEQT.TO
XDGH.TO

Technology

22.9%
9.6%

Financial Services

20.3%
13.2%

Industrials

12.1%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.4%

Basic Materials

7.3%
2.4%

Energy

7.2%
10.3%

Healthcare

6.6%
16.9%

Communication Services

6.4%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
14.8%

Utilities

2.8%
5.6%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.2%

Technology

XEQT.TO
22.9%
XDGH.TO
9.6%

Financial Services

XEQT.TO
20.3%
XDGH.TO
13.2%

Industrials

XEQT.TO
12.1%
XDGH.TO
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XEQT.TO
7.8%
XDGH.TO
9.4%

Basic Materials

XEQT.TO
7.3%
XDGH.TO
2.4%

Energy

XEQT.TO
7.2%
XDGH.TO
10.3%

Healthcare

XEQT.TO
6.6%
XDGH.TO
16.9%

Communication Services

XEQT.TO
6.4%
XDGH.TO
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

XEQT.TO
4.4%
XDGH.TO
14.8%

Utilities

XEQT.TO
2.8%
XDGH.TO
5.6%

Real Estate

XEQT.TO
2.2%
XDGH.TO
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XEQT.TO:
XEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOXEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. XGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. XEI.TOXEQT.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with XDGH.TO:
XDGH.TO vs. XDG.TOXDGH.TO vs. XHD.TOXDGH.TO vs. XDUH.TOXDGH.TO vs. VFV.TOXDGH.TO vs. VIDY.TOXDGH.TO vs. ACWVXDGH.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO
XDGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XEQT.TOXDGH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.62
1.89

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.61
2.85

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.34

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.86

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.13

8.50

+7.63

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEQT.TO and XDGH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XEQT.TOXDGH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

1.89

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.68

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.54

+0.42

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, smaller than the maximum XDGH.TO drawdown of -32.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and XDGH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XEQT.TOXDGH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.74%

-32.99%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-6.38%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

-11.96%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

-14.56%

-5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.68%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-3.63%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.15%

-0.26%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO) at 2.51%. This indicates that XEQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDGH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XEQT.TOXDGH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

2.51%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

6.86%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

9.69%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

12.13%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

14.60%

+0.96%

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDGH.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than XDGH.TO's 2.79% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.79%2.81%3.04%3.41%3.18%3.05%3.24%2.82%3.29%0.81%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.47%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XEQT.TO and XDGH.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XDGH.TO.

Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XEQT.TO and 0.22% for XDGH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and XDGH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer