PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT.TO's 29.42% return.


XEQT.TO

1D
-2.62%
1M
1.43%
YTD
10.25%
6M
9.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQT.TO

1D
-1.76%
1M
10.04%
YTD
29.42%
6M
26.01%
1Y
63.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and QQQT.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEQT.TO

QQQT.TO
QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEQT.TOQQQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

1.42

+0.81

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum QQQT.TO drawdown of -30.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and QQQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEQT.TOQQQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-30.32%

+22.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-1.87%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-5.10%

+4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEQT.TOQQQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

21.68%

-9.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.98%

26.24%

-14.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.98%

26.24%

-14.26%

XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than QQQT.TO's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
0.23%0.30%0.38%0.25%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.51%1.66%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEQT.TO and QQQT.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQQT.TO.

XEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQT.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XEQT.TO and 0.25% for QQQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and QQQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer