PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XEN.TO (iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF) and HHIC.TO (Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. XEN.TO is passively managed, while HHIC.TO is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XEN.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HHIC.TO.

Performance

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEN.TO achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly lower than HHIC.TO's 14.73% return.

XEN.TO

1D
0.70%
1M
4.07%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.76%
1Y
35.69%
3Y*
23.12%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
12.35%

HHIC.TO

1D
0.98%
1M
5.32%
YTD
14.73%
6M
14.55%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
XEN.TO
iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF		10.45%13.89%
HHIC.TO
Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF		14.73%16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XEN.TO and HHIC.TO is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025

0.80

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XEN.TO
HHIC.TO

Financial Services

34.8%
32.7%

Energy

18.6%
34.8%

Basic Materials

18.3%
11.3%

Industrials

10.0%

-

Technology

8.1%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Communication Services

0.8%
10.2%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

XEN.TO
34.8%
HHIC.TO
32.7%

Energy

XEN.TO
18.6%
HHIC.TO
34.8%

Basic Materials

XEN.TO
18.3%
HHIC.TO
11.3%

Industrials

XEN.TO
10.0%
HHIC.TO

-

Technology

XEN.TO
8.1%
HHIC.TO
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XEN.TO
3.3%
HHIC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XEN.TO
3.1%
HHIC.TO

-

Utilities

XEN.TO
2.6%
HHIC.TO

-

Communication Services

XEN.TO
0.8%
HHIC.TO
10.2%

Real Estate

XEN.TO
0.4%
HHIC.TO

-

Healthcare

XEN.TO

-

HHIC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF

Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF

Often compared with XEN.TO:
XEN.TO vs. GEQT.TOXEN.TO vs. XCSR.TOXEN.TO vs. XDSR.TOXEN.TO vs. VFV.TOXEN.TO vs. DMEC.TOXEN.TO vs. XIU.TOXEN.TO vs. XIC.TO
Often compared with HHIC.TO:
HHIC.TO vs. HHIS.TOHHIC.TO vs. HDIV.TOHHIC.TO vs. ECHI.TOHHIC.TO vs. VDY.TOHHIC.TO vs. CANY.TOHHIC.TO vs. XIU.TOHHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO

Return for Risk

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XEN.TO
XEN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XEN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
HHIC.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XEN.TOHHIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.91

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.87

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.92

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XEN.TOHHIC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

2.67

-2.23

Drawdowns

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEN.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.69%, which is greater than HHIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEN.TO and HHIC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XEN.TOHHIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.69%

-7.26%

-42.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.24%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-1.47%

-6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

—

—

Volatility

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XEN.TOHHIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

16.65%

-4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

16.65%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

16.65%

-1.58%

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEN.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HHIC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than HHIC.TO's 10.80% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HHIC.TO
Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF		10.80%4.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEN.TO
iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF		1.67%1.83%2.29%2.46%2.60%1.73%3.72%2.13%2.31%1.75%2.07%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

XEN.TO and HHIC.TO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HHIC.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HHIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for XEN.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XEN.TO and 0.40% for HHIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEN.TO and HHIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer