XEN.TO vs. ^GSPC
XEN.TO (iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF) is Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, XEN.TO returned 12.32%/yr vs 14.52%/yr for ^GSPC. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XEN.TO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XEN.TO is traded in CAD, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEN.TO achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, XEN.TO has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 12.32%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.
XEN.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 34.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
XEN.TO vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEN.TO iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF | 9.68% | 34.17% | 16.91% | 12.18% | -3.37% | 28.00% | -0.30% | 17.34% | -7.93% | 10.65% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 11.75% | 11.05% | 33.90% | 21.49% | -13.70% | 25.75% | 14.29% | 22.54% | 1.71% | 11.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEN.TO and ^GSPC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.43 |
The correlation between XEN.TO and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEN.TO vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
XEN.TO
^GSPC
XEN.TO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEN.TO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.47 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 3.24 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | 12.23 | +5.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEN.TO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 2.46 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 1.05 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.89 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.99 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
XEN.TO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEN.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.69%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -27.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEN.TO and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEN.TO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.69% | -27.59% | -22.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -8.86% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.31% | -19.23% | +5.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.79% | -22.60% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.24% | -27.59% | -8.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -3.51% | -4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.34% | -0.45% |
Volatility
XEN.TO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO) is 2.49%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that XEN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEN.TO | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 2.69% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 8.85% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 11.70% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 14.99% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 16.33% | -1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEN.TO and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XEN.TO and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer