XEML vs. FDD
XEML (Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF) and FDD (First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund) are both Europe Equities funds - XEML tracks the STOXX Europe Total Market Leaders Index while FDD tracks the STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XEML charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FDD.
Performance
XEML vs. FDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEML achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than FDD's 10.04% return.
XEML
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDD
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 25.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
XEML vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XEML Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF | 1.49% | -0.42% |
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 10.04% | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEML and FDD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEML vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank
XEML
FDD
XEML vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF (XEML) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEML | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.09 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
XEML vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEML drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEML and FDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEML | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.49% | -74.77% | +61.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -3.57% | -3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -35.45% | +30.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.80% | — |
Volatility
XEML vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEML | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.83% | 15.62% | +4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 18.43% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 20.17% | -0.34% |
XEML vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEML has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEML vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison
XEML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FDD's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 3.59% | 3.99% | 7.65% | 6.85% | 6.07% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 4.69% | 5.05% | 2.78% | 4.88% | 4.35% |
XEML Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEML and FDD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEML is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEML is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.
FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.10% for XEML.
XEML tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Leaders Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XEML and 0.58% for FDD.
Find the right allocation for XEML and FDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer