PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XEG.TO vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XEG.TO vs. XLK

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEG.TO returned 11.69%/yr vs 26.27%/yr for XLK. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEG.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.

Performance

XEG.TO vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEG.TO is traded in CAD, while XLK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEG.TO achieves a 38.53% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 31.13% return. Over the past 10 years, XEG.TO has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 11.69%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 26.27% annualized return.

XEG.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
-3.89%
YTD
38.53%
6M
37.54%
1Y
51.12%
3Y*
26.37%
5Y*
28.03%
10Y*
11.69%

XLK

1D
1.05%
1M
4.96%
YTD
31.13%
6M
30.81%
1Y
59.71%
3Y*
32.23%
5Y*
25.59%
10Y*
26.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEG.TO vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF		38.53%16.72%14.04%3.55%53.25%83.71%-34.44%9.04%-27.05%-11.17%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF		31.13%18.92%31.93%52.31%-23.15%34.68%40.21%43.68%6.59%25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XEG.TO and XLK is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.28

The correlation between XEG.TO and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XEG.TO vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XEG.TO
XLK

Energy

100.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

99.7%

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XEG.TO
100.0%
XLK
0.2%

Basic Materials

XEG.TO

-

XLK

-

Communication Services

XEG.TO

-

XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

XEG.TO

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

XEG.TO

-

XLK

-

Financial Services

XEG.TO

-

XLK

-

Healthcare

XEG.TO

-

XLK

-

Industrials

XEG.TO

-

XLK
0.1%

Real Estate

XEG.TO

-

XLK

-

Technology

XEG.TO

-

XLK
99.7%

Utilities

XEG.TO

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Often compared with XEG.TO:
XEG.TO vs. XLEXEG.TO vs. XEQT.TOXEG.TO vs. CNQ.TOXEG.TO vs. HXE.TOXEG.TO vs. ZEO.TOXEG.TO vs. XDIV.TOXEG.TO vs. XCG.TO
Often compared with XLK:
XLK vs. QQQXLK vs. VGTXLK vs. SMHXLK vs. SPYXLK vs. FTECXLK vs. XLEXLK vs. IYW

Return for Risk

XEG.TO vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEG.TO vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XEG.TOXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.41
2.51

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.93
3.10

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.04

3.52

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.38

10.37

+4.01

XEG.TO vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEG.TO and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEG.TO vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEG.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -38.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEG.TO and XLK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XEG.TOXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.51%

-38.68%

-48.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-16.16%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.67%

-26.35%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.42%

-29.64%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.66%

-29.64%

-50.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.87%

-5.87%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-7.56%

-26.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

5.48%

-1.59%

Volatility

XEG.TO vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) is 9.11%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that XEG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XEG.TOXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.11%

10.83%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.65%

19.12%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.30%

22.68%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.72%

25.91%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.40%

25.57%

+7.83%

XEG.TO vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEG.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEG.TO vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

XEG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF		2.76%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF		0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

XEG.TO and XLK have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XEG.TO.

XEG.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XEG.TO and 0.08% for XLK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEG.TO and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer