XEG.TO vs. RAAX
XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) and RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index, while RAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by VanEck. XEG.TO is passively managed, while RAAX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XEG.TO returned 28.03%/yr vs 16.49%/yr for RAAX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEG.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for RAAX.
Performance
XEG.TO vs. RAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XEG.TO is traded in CAD, while RAAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RAAX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEG.TO achieves a 38.53% return, which is significantly higher than RAAX's 20.02% return.
XEG.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- 38.53%
- 6M
- 37.54%
- 1Y
- 51.12%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
RAAX
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 20.02%
- 6M
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 35.74%
- 3Y*
- 23.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.49%
- 10Y*
- —
XEG.TO vs. RAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 38.53% | 16.72% | 14.04% | 3.55% | 53.25% | 83.71% | -34.44% | 9.04% | -22.57% |
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 20.02% | 20.96% | 22.02% | 4.18% | 7.95% | 21.50% | -10.44% | 1.77% | 4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEG.TO and RAAX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018 | 0.51 |
The correlation between XEG.TO and RAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEG.TO vs. RAAX — Risk / Return Rank
XEG.TO
RAAX
XEG.TO vs. RAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEG.TO | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.04 | 5.76 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.38 | 21.64 | -7.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEG.TO vs. RAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEG.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than RAAX's maximum drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEG.TO and RAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEG.TO | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.51% | -29.03% | -58.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -6.34% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.67% | -11.92% | -13.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.42% | -17.70% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.87% | -1.74% | -6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -5.19% | -29.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 1.69% | +2.20% |
Volatility
XEG.TO vs. RAAX - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) at 4.84%. This indicates that XEG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEG.TO | RAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 4.84% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.65% | 12.44% | +7.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.30% | 14.43% | +8.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 16.55% | +12.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 16.76% | +16.64% |
XEG.TO vs. RAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEG.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEG.TO vs. RAAX - Dividend Comparison
XEG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than RAAX's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 1.99% | 2.34% | 1.91% | 3.66% | 1.53% | 8.72% | 6.27% | 2.37% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 2.76% | 3.63% | 3.46% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 1.64% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.25% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 3.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEG.TO and RAAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEG.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEG.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.
XEG.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while RAAX is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XEG.TO and 0.78% for RAAX.
Find the right allocation for XEG.TO and RAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer