PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEG.TO vs. PXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEG.TO vs. PXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEG.TO is traded in CAD, while PXI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PXI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEG.TO achieves a 44.34% return, which is significantly higher than PXI's 33.08% return. Over the past 10 years, XEG.TO has outperformed PXI with an annualized return of 11.85%, while PXI has yielded a comparatively lower 7.02% annualized return.


XEG.TO

1D
1.17%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
44.34%
6M
39.73%
1Y
70.40%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
29.48%
10Y*
11.85%

PXI

1D
0.87%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
33.08%
6M
24.34%
1Y
45.44%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
19.75%
10Y*
7.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEG.TO vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
44.34%16.72%14.08%3.52%53.25%83.71%-34.41%8.98%-27.05%-11.18%
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
33.08%-0.91%9.42%3.16%56.25%73.47%-37.00%-3.33%-21.42%-14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XEG.TO and PXI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.77

The correlation between XEG.TO and PXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

XEG.TO vs. PXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEG.TO
PXI

Energy

100.0%
95.6%

Basic Materials

-

4.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XEG.TO
100.0%
PXI
95.6%

Basic Materials

XEG.TO

-

PXI
4.4%

Communication Services

XEG.TO

-

PXI

-

Consumer Cyclical

XEG.TO

-

PXI

-

Consumer Defensive

XEG.TO

-

PXI

-

Financial Services

XEG.TO

-

PXI

-

Healthcare

XEG.TO

-

PXI

-

Industrials

XEG.TO

-

PXI
0.9%

Real Estate

XEG.TO

-

PXI

-

Technology

XEG.TO

-

PXI

-

Utilities

XEG.TO

-

PXI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEG.TO vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PXI
PXI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEG.TO vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEG.TOPXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.34

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.36

3.76

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.02

11.99

+7.03

XEG.TO vs. PXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the PXI Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEG.TO and PXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEG.TOPXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

2.10

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.64

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.20

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.30

-0.02

Drawdowns

XEG.TO vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEG.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.74%, which is greater than PXI's maximum drawdown of -79.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEG.TO and PXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEG.TOPXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.74%

-79.81%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-12.15%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.67%

-29.28%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.42%

-30.78%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.66%

-77.22%

-2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-3.55%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.19%

-20.30%

-8.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

3.80%

-0.09%

Volatility

XEG.TO vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.31% compared to Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) at 7.96%. This indicates that XEG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEG.TOPXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.31%

7.96%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.99%

16.82%

+2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

21.80%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.62%

31.24%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.41%

34.73%

-1.32%

XEG.TO vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEG.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than PXI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEG.TO vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison

XEG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than PXI's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
1.29%1.81%1.52%1.82%3.14%0.57%1.72%2.80%0.93%0.80%0.73%2.07%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
2.65%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEG.TO and PXI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PXI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PXI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XEG.TO.

XEG.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while PXI is Momentum. XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index, while PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XEG.TO and 0.60% for PXI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEG.TO and PXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer