XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

XEC1.DE (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both exchange-traded funds - XEC1.DE is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond, while CMU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEC1.DE returned 4.27%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for CMU.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEC1.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XEC1.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XEC1.DE is traded in EUR, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEC1.DE achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 18.60% return.

XEC1.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: -0.00%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 1Y: 1.28%
• 3Y*: 4.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.63%

CMU.L

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 17.34%
• YTD: 18.60%
• 1Y: 28.64%
• 3Y*: 15.53%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: 9.96%
• ALL TIME*: 8.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XEC1.DE Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	0.42%	3.01%	4.27%	7.53%	-13.41%	17.99%
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	18.60%	19.15%	6.31%	16.82%	-10.18%	4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XEC1.DE and CMU.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2021	0.30

The correlation between XEC1.DE and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEC1.DE

XEC1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 18
XEC1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
XEC1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
XEC1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XEC1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
XEC1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XEC1.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XEC1.DE	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.89	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	2.73	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.35	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	2.69	-2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	10.30	-8.70

XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEC1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEC1.DE and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEC1.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -38.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEC1.DE and CMU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEC1.DE	CMU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.37%	-38.75%	+22.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	-10.61%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.66%	-14.04%	+11.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-2.65%	+1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.48%	-6.75%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	2.77%	-1.97%

Volatility

XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XEC1.DE) is 0.77%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that XEC1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEC1.DE	CMU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	3.64%	-2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.80%	12.60%	-9.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.17%	15.10%	-11.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.63%	16.00%	-6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.63%	16.82%	-7.19%

XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEC1.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XEC1.DE vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

XEC1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XEC1.DE Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	2.71%	2.50%	2.68%	1.77%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XEC1.DE and CMU.L in my portfolio?

XEC1.DE and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XEC1.DE or CMU.L?

On fees, XEC1.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XEC1.DE or CMU.L?

XEC1.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.

What is the main difference between XEC1.DE and CMU.L?

XEC1.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while CMU.L is Europe Equities. XEC1.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XEC1.DE and 0.15% for CMU.L.