PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XEC1.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEC1.DE achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than AMEM.DE's 20.68% return.


XEC1.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.36%
6M
-0.00%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
1.28%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.63%

AMEM.DE

1D
1.23%
1M
-8.29%
6M
12.96%
YTD
20.68%
1Y
35.22%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
8.29%
ALL TIME*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XEC1.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.42%3.01%4.27%7.53%-13.41%17.99%
AMEM.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR
20.68%19.22%13.69%5.35%-13.83%-1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XEC1.DE and AMEM.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2021

0.21

Over the past year, XEC1.DE and AMEM.DE have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEC1.DE
XEC1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XEC1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEC1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEC1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XEC1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEC1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEM.DE
AMEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XEC1.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEC1.DEAMEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.32

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

3.17

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

9.65

-8.05

XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEC1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEC1.DE and AMEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEC1.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum AMEM.DE drawdown of -35.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEC1.DE and AMEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEC1.DEAMEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-35.91%

+19.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-11.06%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-19.20%

+16.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-9.96%

+9.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-10.19%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

3.64%

-2.84%

Volatility

XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (XEC1.DE) is 0.77%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that XEC1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEC1.DEAMEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

8.54%

-7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

17.72%

-14.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

20.15%

-16.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.63%

17.27%

-7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.63%

18.48%

-8.85%

XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEC1.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEM.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEC1.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

XEC1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while AMEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMEM.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEC1.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.71%2.50%2.68%1.77%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEC1.DE and AMEM.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEC1.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEC1.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEM.DE.

XEC1.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while AMEM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. XEC1.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond, while AMEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XEC1.DE and 0.20% for AMEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEC1.DE and AMEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer