XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L
XDWU.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWU.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWU.L returned 8.86%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for XDWH.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWU.L achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWU.L has outperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 8.86%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.
XDWU.L
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWU.L Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 4.59% | 26.14% | 12.54% | 0.30% | -3.57% | 10.23% | 4.86% | 24.37% | 0.63% | 15.46% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.74% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 20.56% | 12.88% | 22.95% | 1.57% | 20.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWU.L and XDWH.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2016 | 0.41 |
The correlation between XDWU.L and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWU.L
XDWH.L
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
XDWU.L
XDWH.L
-
Industrials
XDWU.L
XDWH.L
-
Energy
XDWU.L
XDWH.L
-
Basic Materials
XDWU.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Communication Services
XDWU.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDWU.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDWU.L
-
XDWH.L
Financial Services
XDWU.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Healthcare
XDWU.L
-
XDWH.L
Real Estate
XDWU.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Technology
XDWU.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWU.L
XDWH.L
XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWU.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.11 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 2.80 | +2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWU.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.79 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.32 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.52 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.57 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWU.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWU.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -26.24% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -10.39% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.56% | -19.28% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -19.28% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -26.24% | -7.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -5.82% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -4.98% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 4.12% | -1.48% |
Volatility
XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) is 4.19%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that XDWU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWU.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 4.80% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 10.77% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 14.57% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 14.18% | +1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 14.97% | +2.90% |
XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWU.L and XDWH.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWU.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWU.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWU.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWU.L and XDWH.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDWU.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XDWU.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XDWU.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer