XDWU.L vs. COPX
XDWU.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWU.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWU.L returned 8.86%/yr vs 21.46%/yr for COPX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDWU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
XDWU.L vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWU.L achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.67% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWU.L has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 8.86%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.46% annualized return.
XDWU.L
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
COPX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 25.67%
- 6M
- 37.40%
- 1Y
- 118.00%
- 3Y*
- 37.98%
- 5Y*
- 19.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.46%
XDWU.L vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWU.L Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 4.59% | 26.14% | 12.54% | 0.30% | -3.57% | 10.23% | 4.86% | 24.37% | 0.63% | 15.46% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.67% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWU.L and COPX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2016 | 0.16 |
XDWU.L vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWU.L
COPX
Utilities
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
XDWU.L
COPX
-
Industrials
XDWU.L
COPX
Energy
XDWU.L
COPX
-
Basic Materials
XDWU.L
-
COPX
Communication Services
XDWU.L
-
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDWU.L
-
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
XDWU.L
-
COPX
-
Financial Services
XDWU.L
-
COPX
-
Healthcare
XDWU.L
-
COPX
-
Real Estate
XDWU.L
-
COPX
-
Technology
XDWU.L
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWU.L vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
XDWU.L
COPX
XDWU.L vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWU.L | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.41 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 4.27 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 13.66 | -8.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWU.L | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 2.87 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.55 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.61 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.19 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
XDWU.L vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWU.L and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWU.L | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -83.16% | +49.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -27.82% | +19.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.56% | -39.72% | +22.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -42.12% | +20.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -65.41% | +31.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -5.73% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -39.29% | +33.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 8.67% | -6.03% |
Volatility
XDWU.L vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) is 4.19%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.34%. This indicates that XDWU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWU.L | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 15.34% | -11.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 35.68% | -25.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 41.41% | -28.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 36.50% | -21.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 35.54% | -17.67% |
XDWU.L vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDWU.L vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
XDWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
XDWU.L Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWU.L and COPX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
XDWU.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while COPX is Materials. XDWU.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWU.L and 0.65% for COPX.
Find the right allocation for XDWU.L and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer