PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWU.DE achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly higher than CYBE.AS's 1.79% return.


XDWU.DE

1D
-1.48%
1M
-3.92%
YTD
5.92%
6M
5.19%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
8.32%

CYBE.AS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.88%
1Y
1.70%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDWU.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C
5.92%11.38%19.82%-3.19%2.23%21.23%
CYBE.AS
iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
1.79%0.34%10.03%5.64%0.42%1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWU.DE and CYBE.AS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWU.DE
XDWU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XDWU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CYBE.AS
CYBE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CYBE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWU.DECYBE.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.58

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.77

3.03

+1.74

XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the CYBE.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWU.DE and CYBE.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWU.DECYBE.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.69

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

1.77

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.78

-1.24

Drawdowns

XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWU.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than CYBE.AS's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWU.DE and CYBE.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWU.DECYBE.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-1.81%

-31.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-1.09%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.68%

-1.81%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.26%

-1.81%

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

-0.62%

-6.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-0.42%

-6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

0.58%

+2.13%

Volatility

XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS) at 1.41%. This indicates that XDWU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CYBE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWU.DECYBE.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

1.41%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

2.16%

+7.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

2.51%

+9.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.12%

2.22%

+11.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

2.20%

+12.96%

XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWU.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CYBE.AS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWU.DE vs. CYBE.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWU.DE nor CYBE.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWU.DE and CYBE.AS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWU.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWU.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYBE.AS.

XDWU.DE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while CYBE.AS is Emerging Markets Bonds. XDWU.DE tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while CYBE.AS tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWU.DE and 0.40% for CYBE.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWU.DE and CYBE.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer