CYBE.AS vs. IUST.DE
CYBE.AS (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) and IUST.DE (iShares USD TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CYBE.AS is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while IUST.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CYBE.AS returned 3.85%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for IUST.DE. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CYBE.AS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IUST.DE.
Performance
CYBE.AS vs. IUST.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CYBE.AS achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than IUST.DE's 2.52% return.
CYBE.AS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.85%
- 10Y*
- —
IUST.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 1.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.38%
CYBE.AS vs. IUST.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYBE.AS iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | 1.79% | 0.34% | 10.03% | 5.64% | 0.42% | 1.99% |
IUST.DE iShares USD TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.52% | -4.87% | 7.83% | -0.00% | -7.02% | 13.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYBE.AS and IUST.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYBE.AS vs. IUST.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CYBE.AS
IUST.DE
CYBE.AS vs. IUST.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS) and iShares USD TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUST.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CYBE.AS | IUST.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.09 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.74 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.03 | 1.93 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CYBE.AS | IUST.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 0.50 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.77 | 0.23 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.43 | +1.35 |
Drawdowns
CYBE.AS vs. IUST.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYBE.AS drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum IUST.DE drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBE.AS and IUST.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYBE.AS | IUST.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -19.93% | +18.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.09% | -4.00% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.81% | -10.75% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.81% | -15.19% | +13.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -8.09% | +7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -6.85% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 1.54% | -0.96% |
Volatility
CYBE.AS vs. IUST.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CYBE.AS) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to iShares USD TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUST.DE) at 0.74%. This indicates that CYBE.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUST.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYBE.AS | IUST.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 0.74% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.16% | 4.05% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51% | 5.92% | -3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 8.29% | -6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 8.00% | -5.80% |
CYBE.AS vs. IUST.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CYBE.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IUST.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CYBE.AS vs. IUST.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CYBE.AS nor IUST.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CYBE.AS and IUST.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUST.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUST.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYBE.AS.
CYBE.AS is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IUST.DE is Inflation-Protected Bonds. CYBE.AS tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index, while IUST.DE tracks Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CYBE.AS and 0.10% for IUST.DE.
Find the right allocation for CYBE.AS and IUST.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer