PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWT.L is traded in USD, while SMGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SMGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWT.L achieves a 24.10% return, which is significantly lower than SMGB.L's 85.03% return.


XDWT.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
13.92%
YTD
24.10%
6M
23.59%
1Y
51.40%
3Y*
32.85%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
24.28%

SMGB.L

1D
-2.44%
1M
22.44%
YTD
85.03%
6M
86.05%
1Y
171.14%
3Y*
61.20%
5Y*
36.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
24.10%22.42%33.90%54.82%-31.38%29.86%4.59%
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
85.03%49.26%24.20%74.93%-35.24%43.10%3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWT.L and SMGB.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.83

The correlation between XDWT.L and SMGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWT.L
SMGB.L

Technology

99.1%
100.0%

Communication Services

0.6%

-

Industrials

0.3%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XDWT.L
99.1%
SMGB.L
100.0%

Communication Services

XDWT.L
0.6%
SMGB.L

-

Industrials

XDWT.L
0.3%
SMGB.L

-

Energy

XDWT.L
0.1%
SMGB.L

-

Healthcare

XDWT.L
0.1%
SMGB.L

-

Financial Services

XDWT.L
0.1%
SMGB.L

-

Basic Materials

XDWT.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDWT.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XDWT.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Real Estate

XDWT.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Utilities

XDWT.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SMGB.L
SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWT.LSMGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.70

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

12.00

-8.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

44.83

-35.80

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is lower than the SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWT.L and SMGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWT.LSMGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

5.32

-2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

1.15

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.18

-0.07

Drawdowns

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, smaller than the maximum SMGB.L drawdown of -45.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.L and SMGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWT.LSMGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-45.71%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-14.18%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.10%

-36.86%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.99%

-45.71%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-2.44%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-11.23%

+4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

3.80%

+1.88%

Volatility

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) is 7.39%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that XDWT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWT.LSMGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

12.88%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.71%

25.13%

-9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

32.00%

-11.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

32.13%

-8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

31.85%

-9.76%

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SMGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWT.L vs. SMGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWT.L nor SMGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.44%
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWT.L and SMGB.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWT.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWT.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMGB.L.

XDWT.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMGB.L is Semiconductors. Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWT.L and 0.35% for SMGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWT.L and SMGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer