PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWT.L is traded in USD, while QWTM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QWTM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWT.L achieves a 26.47% return, which is significantly lower than QWTM.L's 54.06% return.


XDWT.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
17.32%
YTD
26.47%
6M
26.19%
1Y
55.17%
3Y*
33.78%
5Y*
21.83%
10Y*
24.59%

QWTM.L

1D
-2.65%
1M
26.07%
YTD
54.06%
6M
53.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDWT.L and QWTM.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

QWTM.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWT.LQWTM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWT.LQWTM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

3.22

-2.09

Drawdowns

XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, which is greater than QWTM.L's maximum drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.L and QWTM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWT.LQWTM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-25.40%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-2.65%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-10.25%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

Volatility

XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWT.LQWTM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.36%

39.83%

-19.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

39.83%

-16.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.08%

39.83%

-17.75%

XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QWTM.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWT.L vs. QWTM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWT.L nor QWTM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWT.L and QWTM.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWT.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWT.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QWTM.L.

XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWT.L and 0.50% for QWTM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWT.L and QWTM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer