PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWT.L achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly lower than IDTW.L's 51.96% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWT.L has outperformed IDTW.L with an annualized return of 23.06%, while IDTW.L has yielded a comparatively lower 19.92% annualized return.


XDWT.L

1D
1.02%
1M
-4.89%
6M
18.68%
YTD
16.10%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
27.55%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
23.06%
ALL TIME*
18.70%

IDTW.L

1D
0.13%
1M
-11.51%
6M
42.30%
YTD
51.96%
1Y
74.29%
3Y*
39.09%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
19.92%
ALL TIME*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
16.10%22.42%33.89%54.83%-31.38%29.86%44.46%46.27%-3.14%37.72%
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
51.96%31.78%23.61%28.84%-29.55%28.51%34.35%34.44%-9.12%28.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWT.L and IDTW.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

0.60

The correlation between XDWT.L and IDTW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWT.L
IDTW.L

Technology

98.8%
80.4%

Communication Services

0.7%
1.3%

Industrials

0.2%
1.6%

Financial Services

0.1%
11.9%

Healthcare

0.1%
0.7%

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XDWT.L
98.8%
IDTW.L
80.4%

Communication Services

XDWT.L
0.7%
IDTW.L
1.3%

Industrials

XDWT.L
0.2%
IDTW.L
1.6%

Financial Services

XDWT.L
0.1%
IDTW.L
11.9%

Healthcare

XDWT.L
0.1%
IDTW.L
0.7%

Energy

XDWT.L
0.1%
IDTW.L

-

Basic Materials

XDWT.L

-

IDTW.L
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XDWT.L

-

IDTW.L
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDWT.L

-

IDTW.L
0.7%

Real Estate

XDWT.L

-

IDTW.L

-

Utilities

XDWT.L

-

IDTW.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IDTW.L
IDTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDWT.LIDTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

5.11

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

16.36

-11.74

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the IDTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWT.L and IDTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, smaller than the maximum IDTW.L drawdown of -60.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.L and IDTW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWT.LIDTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.99%

-60.07%

+24.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-14.46%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.10%

-28.24%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.99%

-40.98%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

-40.98%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.94%

-14.35%

+5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-12.59%

+6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.26%

4.52%

+1.74%

Volatility

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) is 7.71%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that XDWT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWT.LIDTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

12.08%

-4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.85%

24.76%

-6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.26%

28.28%

-6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

23.96%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

22.42%

-0.41%

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWT.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IDTW.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWT.L vs. IDTW.L - Dividend Comparison

XDWT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDTW.L
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.99%1.51%1.43%2.09%3.39%1.35%1.73%2.15%2.78%2.70%3.10%3.33%
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWT.L and IDTW.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWT.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWT.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTW.L.

XDWT.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom Index, while IDTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWT.L and 0.74% for IDTW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWT.L and IDTW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer