PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDWT.DE having a 25.23% return and ZPDT.DE slightly lower at 24.09%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDWT.DE having a 24.00% annualized return and ZPDT.DE not far ahead at 24.05%.


XDWT.DE

1D
-2.03%
1M
14.75%
YTD
25.23%
6M
23.98%
1Y
48.86%
3Y*
29.29%
5Y*
22.52%
10Y*
24.00%

ZPDT.DE

1D
-2.28%
1M
13.81%
YTD
24.09%
6M
23.15%
1Y
49.52%
3Y*
26.33%
5Y*
22.38%
10Y*
24.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
25.23%9.56%41.11%50.00%-28.10%41.76%30.98%51.77%0.78%21.03%
ZPDT.DE
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
24.09%11.31%29.30%52.02%-25.52%47.48%30.46%53.58%1.75%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWT.DE and ZPDT.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.99

The correlation between XDWT.DE and ZPDT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWT.DE
XDWT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDT.DE
ZPDT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWT.DEZPDT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.19

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.24

8.35

-0.11

XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWT.DE and ZPDT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWT.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.43

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.99

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

1.12

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.03

+0.06

Drawdowns

XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWT.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.61%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPDT.DE drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.DE and ZPDT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWT.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.61%

-31.48%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-15.47%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

-29.50%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.46%

-29.50%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.61%

-31.48%

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-3.09%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-5.68%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

5.91%

0.00%

Volatility

XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE) have volatilities of 7.11% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWT.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

7.06%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

14.78%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

20.30%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

22.33%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

21.38%

+0.08%

XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWT.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWT.DE nor ZPDT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XDWT.DE and ZPDT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZPDT.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDT.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.DE.

XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while ZPDT.DE tracks S&P Technology Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWT.DE and 0.15% for ZPDT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWT.DE and ZPDT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer