XNAQ.L vs. FUQA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L).
XNAQ.L and FUQA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XNAQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. FUQA.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. It was launched on Mar 27, 2017. Both XNAQ.L and FUQA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XNAQ.L or FUQA.L.
Performance
XNAQ.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAQ.L achieves a 22.66% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 19.88% return.
XNAQ.L
22.66%
4.66%
11.15%
28.39%
N/A
N/A
FUQA.L
19.88%
1.61%
10.41%
24.73%
13.35%
N/A
Key characteristics
| XNAQ.L | FUQA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | 2.36 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.41 | 3.46 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.45 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.30 | 4.95 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.99 | 17.74 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.02% | 1.40% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.87% | 10.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.52% | -27.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.05% | -0.70% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XNAQ.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAQ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between XNAQ.L and FUQA.L is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XNAQ.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XNAQ.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNAQ.L nor FUQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XNAQ.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAQ.L drawdown since its inception was -27.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAQ.L and FUQA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XNAQ.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 3.13%. This indicates that XNAQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.