XDWT.DE vs. WELL.DE
XDWT.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) and WELL.DE (Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) are both Technology Equities funds - XDWT.DE tracks the MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom Index while WELL.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDWT.DE returned 27.97%/yr vs 26.09%/yr for WELL.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XDWT.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELL.DE.
Performance
XDWT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWT.DE achieves a 20.19% return, which is significantly higher than WELL.DE's 16.86% return.
XDWT.DE
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 20.19%
- 6M
- 20.60%
- 1Y
- 39.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.97%
- 5Y*
- 19.94%
- 10Y*
- 24.01%
WELL.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWT.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 20.19% | 9.56% | 41.11% | 50.00% | -9.35% |
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 16.86% | 9.77% | 38.81% | 57.34% | -8.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWT.DE and WELL.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between XDWT.DE and WELL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWT.DE vs. WELL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWT.DE
WELL.DE
XDWT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDWT.DE | WELL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.18 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 5.49 | +0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDWT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWT.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than WELL.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.DE and WELL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWT.DE | WELL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -28.78% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -16.18% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -28.78% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.53% | -6.22% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -4.75% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.08% | 6.44% | -0.36% |
Volatility
XDWT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELL.DE) at 7.69%. This indicates that XDWT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWT.DE | WELL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 7.69% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.88% | 15.47% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.34% | 20.98% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 22.43% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 22.43% | -0.21% |
XDWT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WELL.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWT.DE vs. WELL.DE - Dividend Comparison
XDWT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WELL.DE Amundi S&P Global Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 0.28% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.14% |
XDWT.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, XDWT.DE and WELL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WELL.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELL.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.DE.
XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom Index, while WELL.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Information Technology. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWT.DE and 0.18% for WELL.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWT.DE and WELL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer