PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWT.DE achieves a 20.19% return, which is significantly higher than IQQI.DE's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWT.DE has outperformed IQQI.DE with an annualized return of 24.01%, while IQQI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.26% annualized return.


XDWT.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
20.19%
6M
20.60%
1Y
39.51%
3Y*
27.97%
5Y*
19.94%
10Y*
24.01%

IQQI.DE

1D
0.32%
1M
1.20%
YTD
14.89%
6M
15.89%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
7.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
20.19%9.56%41.11%50.00%-28.10%41.76%30.98%51.77%0.75%21.05%
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
14.89%0.56%14.53%-3.18%-0.38%26.94%-10.82%27.73%2.23%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWT.DE and IQQI.DE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

0.45

The correlation between XDWT.DE and IQQI.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWT.DE
XDWT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQI.DE
IQQI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDWT.DEIQQI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

4.23

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

10.58

-4.10

XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWT.DE and IQQI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWT.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than IQQI.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWT.DE and IQQI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWT.DEIQQI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-42.24%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-4.81%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

-14.75%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.46%

-24.82%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-34.16%

+2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

0.00%

-6.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-11.11%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.08%

1.92%

+4.16%

Volatility

XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) at 4.41%. This indicates that XDWT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWT.DEIQQI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.55%

4.41%

+4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

8.95%

+6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.34%

10.83%

+10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

12.77%

+9.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%

14.25%

+7.97%

XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWT.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDWT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
2.01%2.30%2.29%2.42%2.13%1.85%2.25%2.05%2.30%2.76%2.63%3.15%
XDWT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWT.DE and IQQI.DE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWT.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWT.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

XDWT.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while IQQI.DE is Global Equities. XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom Index, while IQQI.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWT.DE and 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWT.DE and IQQI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer