XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L
XDWS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C) and IUCS.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XDWS.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while IUCS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDWS.L returned 3.97%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for IUCS.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUCS.L.
Performance
XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWS.L achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than IUCS.L's 6.36% return.
XDWS.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
IUCS.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 2.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C | 3.29% | 9.31% | 5.69% | 1.96% | -5.24% | 12.84% | 7.75% | 22.32% | -10.10% | 9.47% |
IUCS.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.36% | 3.96% | 14.33% | -0.38% | -0.06% | 18.15% | 9.27% | 27.30% | -9.43% | 6.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWS.L and IUCS.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between XDWS.L and IUCS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWS.L
IUCS.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
XDWS.L
IUCS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDWS.L
IUCS.L
Financial Services
XDWS.L
IUCS.L
-
Healthcare
XDWS.L
IUCS.L
-
Basic Materials
XDWS.L
-
IUCS.L
-
Communication Services
XDWS.L
-
IUCS.L
-
Energy
XDWS.L
-
IUCS.L
-
Industrials
XDWS.L
-
IUCS.L
-
Real Estate
XDWS.L
-
IUCS.L
-
Technology
XDWS.L
-
IUCS.L
-
Utilities
XDWS.L
-
IUCS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWS.L
IUCS.L
XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWS.L | IUCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.04 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 0.23 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 0.49 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWS.L | IUCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 0.16 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.50 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, roughly equal to the maximum IUCS.L drawdown of -23.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.L and IUCS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWS.L | IUCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.72% | -23.90% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.74% | -9.42% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.52% | -12.00% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.53% | -17.20% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.95% | -8.12% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -4.35% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 4.43% | -0.05% |
Volatility
XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) is 4.62%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that XDWS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWS.L | IUCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 5.63% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 11.25% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 13.79% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 13.43% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 14.99% | -2.51% |
XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUCS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWS.L vs. IUCS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWS.L nor IUCS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XDWS.L and IUCS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IUCS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUCS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWS.L.
XDWS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while IUCS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWS.L and 0.15% for IUCS.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWS.L and IUCS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer