XDWS.DE vs. CEMG.DE
XDWS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C) and CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, from Xtrackers and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWS.DE returned 5.34%/yr vs 3.56%/yr for CEMG.DE. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDWS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CEMG.DE.
Performance
XDWS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWS.DE achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than CEMG.DE's -7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWS.DE has outperformed CEMG.DE with an annualized return of 5.34%, while CEMG.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.56% annualized return.
XDWS.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- -0.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
XDWS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C | 4.43% | -3.34% | 12.56% | -1.53% | -0.06% | 22.38% | -1.96% | 25.94% | -5.88% | 2.82% |
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | -16.08% | -1.07% | 11.30% | 25.51% | -16.68% | 23.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWS.DE and CEMG.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XDWS.DE and CEMG.DE has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWS.DE vs. CEMG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWS.DE
CEMG.DE
XDWS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWS.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.91 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | -0.58 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | -1.23 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWS.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | -0.64 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | -0.12 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.19 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.22 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
XDWS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum CEMG.DE drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.DE and CEMG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWS.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -33.94% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -14.05% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.90% | -20.18% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.47% | -31.08% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | -33.94% | +10.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | -18.75% | +11.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -12.26% | +7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 6.68% | -2.34% |
Volatility
XDWS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that XDWS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWS.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 4.37% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 10.24% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 12.88% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 18.54% | -7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 18.33% | -6.14% |
XDWS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDWS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWS.DE nor CEMG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWS.DE and CEMG.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWS.DE and 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWS.DE and CEMG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer