XDWS.DE vs. 2B7D.DE
XDWS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C) and 2B7D.DE (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XDWS.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while 2B7D.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDWS.DE returned 4.93%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for 2B7D.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 2B7D.DE.
Performance
XDWS.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWS.DE achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7D.DE's 7.60% return.
XDWS.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 0.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
2B7D.DE
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 5.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWS.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C | 4.43% | -3.34% | 12.56% | -1.53% | -0.06% | 22.38% | -1.96% | 25.94% | -5.88% | -1.74% |
2B7D.DE iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 7.60% | -8.12% | 21.83% | -3.82% | 5.50% | 28.07% | -0.37% | 32.49% | -6.43% | -11.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWS.DE and 2B7D.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between XDWS.DE and 2B7D.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWS.DE vs. 2B7D.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWS.DE
2B7D.DE
XDWS.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWS.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.04 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 0.03 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 0.05 | -0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWS.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 0.02 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.47 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.35 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
XDWS.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum 2B7D.DE drawdown of -26.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.DE and 2B7D.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWS.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -26.89% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -16.85% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.90% | -16.85% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.47% | -16.85% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | -9.21% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -8.47% | +3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 8.88% | -4.54% |
Volatility
XDWS.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) is 5.00%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (2B7D.DE) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that XDWS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7D.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWS.DE | 2B7D.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 6.09% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 11.56% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 25.70% | -13.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 16.48% | -5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 16.93% | -4.74% |
XDWS.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7D.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWS.DE vs. 2B7D.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWS.DE nor 2B7D.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XDWS.DE and 2B7D.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, 2B7D.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B7D.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWS.DE.
XDWS.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while 2B7D.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWS.DE and 0.15% for 2B7D.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWS.DE and 2B7D.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer