PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWM.L is traded in USD, while JEDG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JEDG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWM.L achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly lower than JEDG.L's 74.46% return.


XDWM.L

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.35%
YTD
15.43%
6M
20.04%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.95%

JEDG.L

1D
1.54%
1M
22.67%
YTD
74.46%
6M
98.10%
1Y
208.94%
3Y*
70.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDWM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C
15.43%26.77%-6.34%14.84%4.23%
JEDG.L
VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF
74.46%93.99%43.70%12.05%-13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWM.L and JEDG.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022

0.53

The correlation between XDWM.L and JEDG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWM.L
XDWM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

JEDG.L
JEDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) and VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWM.LJEDG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.57

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

8.47

-6.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

28.03

-20.02

XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the JEDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWM.L and JEDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWM.LJEDG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

4.60

-2.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.40

-0.66

Drawdowns

XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWM.L drawdown since its inception was -37.37%, which is greater than JEDG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWM.L and JEDG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWM.LJEDG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.37%

-27.38%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.35%

-24.52%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.45%

-25.63%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-14.03%

+10.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-8.79%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

7.42%

-3.41%

Volatility

XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) is 7.56%, while VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDG.L) has a volatility of 19.56%. This indicates that XDWM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWM.LJEDG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

19.56%

-12.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.49%

35.71%

-19.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

45.14%

-25.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

34.52%

-14.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.61%

34.52%

-10.91%

XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JEDG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWM.L vs. JEDG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWM.L nor JEDG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWM.L and JEDG.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JEDG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWM.L and 0.55% for JEDG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWM.L and JEDG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer