PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) and SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C
10.99%26.77%-6.34%14.84%-10.00%15.53%19.91%23.00%-16.57%25.06%
WMAT.L
SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF
10.86%26.36%-5.73%14.40%-10.02%15.63%20.67%22.51%-17.30%29.05%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDWM.L having a 10.99% return and WMAT.L slightly lower at 10.86%.


XDWM.L

1D
3.46%
1M
-6.05%
YTD
10.99%
6M
17.19%
1Y
33.78%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*

WMAT.L

1D
3.40%
1M
-6.19%
YTD
10.86%
6M
17.37%
1Y
33.79%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WMAT.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWM.L
XDWM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

WMAT.L
WMAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
WMAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) and SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWM.LWMAT.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.70

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

2.25

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.18

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.98

9.22

-0.24

XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the WMAT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWM.L and WMAT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWM.LWMAT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.70

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.42

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.57

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between XDWM.L and WMAT.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWM.L nor WMAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWM.L drawdown since its inception was -37.37%, roughly equal to the maximum WMAT.L drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWM.L and WMAT.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWM.LWMAT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.37%

-38.35%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.35%

-15.51%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.07%

-28.08%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.14%

-7.40%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-7.24%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

3.67%

+0.09%

Volatility

XDWM.L vs. WMAT.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) and SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) have volatilities of 9.14% and 8.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDWM.LWMAT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

8.88%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

14.95%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

19.81%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

19.36%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

19.37%

+4.23%