XDWM.L vs. IISU.L
XDWM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C) and IISU.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Industrials Equities funds - XDWM.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while IISU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDWM.L returned 6.89%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for IISU.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IISU.L.
Performance
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDWM.L is traded in USD, while IISU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IISU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWM.L achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than IISU.L's 12.36% return.
XDWM.L
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- 1Y
- 32.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
IISU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C | 15.43% | 26.77% | -6.34% | 14.84% | -10.00% | 15.53% | 19.91% | 23.00% | -16.57% | 20.88% |
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.36% | 19.63% | 17.30% | 17.33% | -5.28% | 21.09% | 9.50% | 29.46% | -14.33% | 16.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWM.L and IISU.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XDWM.L and IISU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWM.L
IISU.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XDWM.L
IISU.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDWM.L
IISU.L
Technology
XDWM.L
IISU.L
Consumer Defensive
XDWM.L
IISU.L
-
Industrials
XDWM.L
IISU.L
Communication Services
XDWM.L
-
IISU.L
-
Energy
XDWM.L
-
IISU.L
-
Financial Services
XDWM.L
-
IISU.L
-
Healthcare
XDWM.L
-
IISU.L
-
Real Estate
XDWM.L
-
IISU.L
-
Utilities
XDWM.L
-
IISU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWM.L
IISU.L
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWM.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.12 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 8.33 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWM.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.64 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.71 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.65 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWM.L drawdown since its inception was -37.37%, smaller than the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWM.L and IISU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWM.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.37% | -41.81% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.35% | -10.84% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.45% | -19.93% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.07% | -21.88% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -1.21% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.28% | -5.12% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 2.77% | +1.24% |
Volatility
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) at 4.63%. This indicates that XDWM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IISU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWM.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 4.63% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.49% | 11.28% | +5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.27% | 14.03% | +5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 17.06% | +2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 19.59% | +4.02% |
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWM.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWM.L and IISU.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IISU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IISU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWM.L.
XDWM.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWM.L and 0.15% for IISU.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWM.L and IISU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer