PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWM.L vs. IISU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWM.L is traded in USD, while IISU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IISU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWM.L achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than IISU.L's 12.36% return.


XDWM.L

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.35%
YTD
15.43%
6M
20.04%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.95%

IISU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.92%
YTD
12.36%
6M
13.85%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
21.84%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C
15.43%26.77%-6.34%14.84%-10.00%15.53%19.91%23.00%-16.57%20.88%
IISU.L
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.36%19.63%17.30%17.33%-5.28%21.09%9.50%29.46%-14.33%16.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWM.L and IISU.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017

0.54

The correlation between XDWM.L and IISU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWM.L
IISU.L

Basic Materials

94.8%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
0.5%

Technology

0.6%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%

-

Industrials

0.4%
90.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

4.9%

Basic Materials

XDWM.L
94.8%
IISU.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XDWM.L
4.2%
IISU.L
0.5%

Technology

XDWM.L
0.6%
IISU.L
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

XDWM.L
0.4%
IISU.L

-

Industrials

XDWM.L
0.4%
IISU.L
90.4%

Communication Services

XDWM.L

-

IISU.L

-

Energy

XDWM.L

-

IISU.L

-

Financial Services

XDWM.L

-

IISU.L

-

Healthcare

XDWM.L

-

IISU.L

-

Real Estate

XDWM.L

-

IISU.L

-

Utilities

XDWM.L

-

IISU.L
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWM.L
XDWM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IISU.L
IISU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IISU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IISU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWM.LIISU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.12

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

8.33

-0.33

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the IISU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWM.L and IISU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWM.LIISU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.64

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.71

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.65

+0.08

Drawdowns

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWM.L drawdown since its inception was -37.37%, smaller than the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWM.L and IISU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWM.LIISU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.37%

-41.81%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.35%

-10.84%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.45%

-19.93%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.07%

-21.88%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-1.21%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-5.12%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

2.77%

+1.24%

Volatility

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) at 4.63%. This indicates that XDWM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IISU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWM.LIISU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

4.63%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.49%

11.28%

+5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

14.03%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

17.06%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.61%

19.59%

+4.02%

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWM.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWM.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWM.L and IISU.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IISU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IISU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWM.L.

XDWM.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWM.L and 0.15% for IISU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWM.L and IISU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer