PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWI.L achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.L's 24.10% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L has underperformed XDWT.L with an annualized return of 12.32%, while XDWT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.28% annualized return.


XDWI.L

1D
0.07%
1M
0.47%
YTD
11.24%
6M
12.95%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
12.32%

XDWT.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
13.92%
YTD
24.10%
6M
23.59%
1Y
51.40%
3Y*
32.85%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
24.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWI.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
11.24%25.51%13.06%23.32%-12.72%16.09%11.85%27.17%-14.83%25.36%
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
24.10%22.42%33.90%54.82%-31.38%29.86%44.46%46.27%-3.14%37.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWI.L and XDWT.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2016

0.67

The correlation between XDWI.L and XDWT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWI.L
XDWT.L

Industrials

95.1%
0.3%

Technology

3.5%
99.1%

Utilities

2.8%

-

Communication Services

0.6%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Financial Services

0.3%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

XDWI.L
95.1%
XDWT.L
0.3%

Technology

XDWI.L
3.5%
XDWT.L
99.1%

Utilities

XDWI.L
2.8%
XDWT.L

-

Communication Services

XDWI.L
0.6%
XDWT.L
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XDWI.L
0.3%
XDWT.L

-

Financial Services

XDWI.L
0.3%
XDWT.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDWI.L
0.1%
XDWT.L

-

Basic Materials

XDWI.L
0.1%
XDWT.L

-

Real Estate

XDWI.L
0.0%
XDWT.L

-

Energy

XDWI.L

-

XDWT.L
0.1%

Healthcare

XDWI.L

-

XDWT.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWI.L
XDWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWI.LXDWT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

3.03

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

9.02

-1.67

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWI.L and XDWT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWI.LXDWT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.51

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.90

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

1.11

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.11

-0.40

Drawdowns

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than XDWT.L's maximum drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.L and XDWT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWI.LXDWT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.92%

-35.99%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-16.86%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-26.10%

+10.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.26%

-35.99%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.92%

-35.99%

-2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-2.66%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-6.41%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

5.68%

-2.71%

Volatility

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) is 5.38%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that XDWI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWI.LXDWT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

7.39%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

15.71%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

20.39%

-4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

23.62%

-6.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

22.09%

-4.32%

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWI.L and XDWT.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWI.L nor XDWT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWI.L and XDWT.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWI.L and XDWT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDWI.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XDWT.L is Technology Equities. XDWI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWI.L and XDWT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer