XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L
XDWI.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWT.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWI.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDWT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L returned 12.32%/yr vs 24.28%/yr for XDWT.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWI.L achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.L's 24.10% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L has underperformed XDWT.L with an annualized return of 12.32%, while XDWT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 24.28% annualized return.
XDWI.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
XDWT.L
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 13.92%
- YTD
- 24.10%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 51.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.85%
- 5Y*
- 21.37%
- 10Y*
- 24.28%
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWI.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C | 11.24% | 25.51% | 13.06% | 23.32% | -12.72% | 16.09% | 11.85% | 27.17% | -14.83% | 25.36% |
XDWT.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 24.10% | 22.42% | 33.90% | 54.82% | -31.38% | 29.86% | 44.46% | 46.27% | -3.14% | 37.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWI.L and XDWT.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2016 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XDWI.L and XDWT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
Technology
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
Utilities
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
-
Communication Services
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
-
Financial Services
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
Consumer Defensive
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
-
Basic Materials
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
-
Real Estate
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
-
Energy
XDWI.L
-
XDWT.L
Healthcare
XDWI.L
-
XDWT.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWI.L
XDWT.L
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWI.L | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.41 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 3.03 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 9.02 | -1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWI.L | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.51 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.90 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 1.11 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.11 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than XDWT.L's maximum drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.L and XDWT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWI.L | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -35.99% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -16.86% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | -26.10% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.26% | -35.99% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.92% | -35.99% | -2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -2.66% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -6.41% | +1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 5.68% | -2.71% |
Volatility
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) is 5.38%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that XDWI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWI.L | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 7.39% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 15.71% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 20.39% | -4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 23.62% | -6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 22.09% | -4.32% |
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWI.L and XDWT.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWI.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWI.L nor XDWT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWI.L and XDWT.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWI.L and XDWT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDWI.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XDWT.L is Technology Equities. XDWI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XDWI.L and XDWT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer