XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L
XDWI.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWI.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L returned 12.32%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for XDWH.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWI.L achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L has outperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 12.32%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.
XDWI.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWI.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C | 11.24% | 25.51% | 13.06% | 23.32% | -12.72% | 16.09% | 11.85% | 27.17% | -14.83% | 25.36% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.74% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 20.56% | 12.88% | 22.95% | 1.57% | 20.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWI.L and XDWH.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XDWI.L and XDWH.L has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
-
Technology
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
-
Utilities
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
-
Communication Services
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
-
Financial Services
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
Basic Materials
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
-
Real Estate
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
-
Energy
XDWI.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Healthcare
XDWI.L
-
XDWH.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWI.L
XDWH.L
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWI.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.11 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 2.80 | +4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWI.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.79 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.32 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.52 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.57 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWI.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -26.24% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -10.39% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | -19.28% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.26% | -19.28% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.92% | -26.24% | -12.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -5.82% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -4.98% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 4.12% | -1.15% |
Volatility
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) at 4.80%. This indicates that XDWI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWI.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.80% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 10.77% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 14.57% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 14.18% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 14.97% | +2.80% |
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWI.L and XDWH.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWI.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWI.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWI.L and XDWH.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDWI.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XDWI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XDWI.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer