PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWI.L achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L has outperformed XDWH.L with an annualized return of 12.32%, while XDWH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.85% annualized return.


XDWI.L

1D
0.07%
1M
0.47%
YTD
11.24%
6M
12.95%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
12.32%

XDWH.L

1D
2.99%
1M
3.25%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-1.64%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWI.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
11.24%25.51%13.06%23.32%-12.72%16.09%11.85%27.17%-14.83%25.36%
XDWH.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-2.74%15.25%0.75%3.81%-5.42%20.56%12.88%22.95%1.57%20.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWI.L and XDWH.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between XDWI.L and XDWH.L has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWI.L
XDWH.L

Industrials

95.1%

-

Technology

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Communication Services

0.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
0.5%

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

98.9%

Industrials

XDWI.L
95.1%
XDWH.L

-

Technology

XDWI.L
3.5%
XDWH.L

-

Utilities

XDWI.L
2.8%
XDWH.L

-

Communication Services

XDWI.L
0.6%
XDWH.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDWI.L
0.3%
XDWH.L

-

Financial Services

XDWI.L
0.3%
XDWH.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XDWI.L
0.1%
XDWH.L
0.5%

Basic Materials

XDWI.L
0.1%
XDWH.L

-

Real Estate

XDWI.L
0.0%
XDWH.L

-

Energy

XDWI.L

-

XDWH.L

-

Healthcare

XDWI.L

-

XDWH.L
98.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWI.L
XDWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.L
XDWH.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWI.LXDWH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.15

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.11

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

2.80

+4.55

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWI.L and XDWH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWI.LXDWH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

0.79

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.32

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.52

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.57

+0.14

Drawdowns

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.L and XDWH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWI.LXDWH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.92%

-26.24%

-12.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-10.39%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-19.28%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.26%

-19.28%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.92%

-26.24%

-12.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-5.82%

+3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-4.98%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

4.12%

-1.15%

Volatility

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) at 4.80%. This indicates that XDWI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWI.LXDWH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

4.80%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

10.77%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

14.57%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

14.18%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

14.97%

+2.80%

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWI.L and XDWH.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWI.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWI.L nor XDWH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWI.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWI.L and XDWH.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDWI.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XDWI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWI.L and XDWH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer