XDWI.DE vs. WELH.DE
XDWI.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) and WELH.DE (Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Industrials Equities funds - XDWI.DE tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while WELH.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Industrials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDWI.DE returned 18.27%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for WELH.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWI.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WELH.DE.
Performance
XDWI.DE vs. WELH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWI.DE achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than WELH.DE's 15.64% return.
XDWI.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
WELH.DE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 15.64%
- 6M
- 15.67%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWI.DE vs. WELH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWI.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C | 12.20% | 12.06% | 19.50% | 19.04% | 5.27% |
WELH.DE Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 15.64% | 9.85% | 16.48% | 19.96% | 7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWI.DE and WELH.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between XDWI.DE and WELH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWI.DE vs. WELH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWI.DE
WELH.DE
XDWI.DE vs. WELH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWI.DE | WELH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 2.43 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 8.98 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWI.DE | WELH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.60 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.26 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
XDWI.DE vs. WELH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWI.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, which is greater than WELH.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.DE and WELH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWI.DE | WELH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.10% | -20.70% | -17.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -9.84% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.09% | -20.70% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | 0.00% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -2.65% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.67% | -0.07% |
Volatility
XDWI.DE vs. WELH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELH.DE) have volatilities of 3.96% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWI.DE | WELH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.89% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 12.20% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 14.98% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 15.28% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 15.28% | +1.50% |
XDWI.DE vs. WELH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWI.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WELH.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWI.DE vs. WELH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWI.DE nor WELH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XDWI.DE and WELH.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WELH.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELH.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWI.DE.
XDWI.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while WELH.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Industrials. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWI.DE and 0.18% for WELH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWI.DE and WELH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer