XDWI.DE vs. ESIN.DE
XDWI.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) and ESIN.DE (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from Xtrackers and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDWI.DE returned 12.48%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for ESIN.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWI.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIN.DE.
Performance
XDWI.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWI.DE achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly higher than ESIN.DE's 8.75% return.
XDWI.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
ESIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 15.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWI.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWI.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C | 12.20% | 12.06% | 19.50% | 19.04% | -7.86% | 11.54% |
ESIN.DE iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 8.75% | 25.30% | 14.45% | 26.98% | -16.86% | 13.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWI.DE and ESIN.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between XDWI.DE and ESIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWI.DE vs. ESIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWI.DE
ESIN.DE
XDWI.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWI.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.16 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 4.21 | +3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWI.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.78 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.67 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.70 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
XDWI.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWI.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.10%, which is greater than ESIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.DE and ESIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWI.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.10% | -29.12% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -13.11% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.09% | -18.30% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.09% | -29.12% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -2.69% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -6.30% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.61% | -1.01% |
Volatility
XDWI.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) is 3.96%, while iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that XDWI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWI.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 6.37% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 16.51% | -4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 19.60% | -5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 18.85% | -3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 18.81% | -2.03% |
XDWI.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWI.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIN.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWI.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWI.DE nor ESIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWI.DE and ESIN.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIN.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWI.DE.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWI.DE and 0.18% for ESIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWI.DE and ESIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer