XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and XWIS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XWIS.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XDWH.L returned 11.56% vs 21.84% for XWIS.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDWH.L is traded in USD, while XWIS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XWIS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWH.L achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than XWIS.L's 11.12% return.

XDWH.L

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: 3.25%
• YTD: -2.74%
• 6M: -1.64%
• 1Y: 11.56%
• 3Y*: 5.50%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

XWIS.L

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 6M: 13.07%
• 1Y: 21.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C	-2.74%	15.25%	0.75%	1.04%
XWIS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP	11.12%	25.82%	12.97%	7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWH.L and XWIS.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023	0.49

Return for Risk

XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWH.L

XDWH.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XDWH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XDWH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
XDWH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XDWH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDWH.L	XWIS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.45	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	2.25	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.26	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	1.85	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.80	7.25	-4.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the XWIS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWH.L and XWIS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDWH.L	XWIS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	1.45	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	1.36	-0.79

Drawdowns

XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWH.L drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, which is greater than XWIS.L's maximum drawdown of -15.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.L and XWIS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDWH.L	XWIS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.24%	-15.18%	-11.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.39%	-11.74%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.82%	-2.21%	-3.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-2.18%	-2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	3.00%	+1.12%

Volatility

XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDWH.L	XWIS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	4.87%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	12.39%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	15.03%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.18%	15.28%	-1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.97%	15.28%	-0.31%

XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWH.L and XWIS.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDWH.L vs. XWIS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWH.L nor XWIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDWH.L and XWIS.L in my portfolio?

XDWH.L and XWIS.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDWH.L or XWIS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDWH.L or XWIS.L?

XDWH.L and XWIS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between XDWH.L and XWIS.L?

XDWH.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XWIS.L is Industrials Equities. XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XWIS.L tracks MSCI World Index.