XDWH.DE vs. QDVG.DE
XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XDWH.DE tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD while QDVG.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE returned 7.61%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for QDVG.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XDWH.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVG.DE.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.DE achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than QDVG.DE's -1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE has underperformed QDVG.DE with an annualized return of 7.61%, while QDVG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
XDWH.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | 8.90% | 7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and QDVG.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.96 |
The correlation between XDWH.DE and QDVG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.DE vs. QDVG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.DE
QDVG.DE
XDWH.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWH.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.21 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 2.96 | -0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWH.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.89 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.46 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.56 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.48 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVG.DE drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and QDVG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -26.77% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -10.74% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -22.70% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -22.70% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.08% | -26.77% | +0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -7.31% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -5.35% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 4.41% | -0.21% |
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) is 4.81%, while iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that XDWH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.DE | QDVG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 5.24% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 10.23% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 14.70% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 14.48% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 15.77% | -1.08% |
XDWH.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVG.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor QDVG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XDWH.DE and QDVG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.DE and 0.15% for QDVG.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and QDVG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer