XDWH.DE vs. ETL2.DE
XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and ETL2.DE (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while ETL2.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE returned 7.61%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for ETL2.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDWH.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ETL2.DE.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.DE achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than ETL2.DE's 18.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE has underperformed ETL2.DE with an annualized return of 7.61%, while ETL2.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
ETL2.DE
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 18.23%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
XDWH.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
ETL2.DE L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 18.23% | 4.89% | 11.54% | -9.44% | 24.86% | 46.17% | -7.55% | 10.85% | -4.21% | -9.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and ETL2.DE is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.21 |
The correlation between XDWH.DE and ETL2.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.DE vs. ETL2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.DE
ETL2.DE
XDWH.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWH.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 3.59 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 8.20 | -5.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWH.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.87 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.84 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.59 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.25 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, smaller than the maximum ETL2.DE drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and ETL2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -47.04% | +20.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -7.90% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -15.06% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -23.27% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.08% | -26.50% | +0.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -3.57% | -4.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -21.90% | +17.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 3.46% | +0.74% |
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.DE | ETL2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 4.60% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 12.74% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 15.15% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 15.44% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 13.69% | +1.00% |
XDWH.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ETL2.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor ETL2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.DE and ETL2.DE have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ETL2.DE.
XDWH.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ETL2.DE is Commodities. XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while ETL2.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.DE and 0.30% for ETL2.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and ETL2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer