XDWH.DE vs. DXSE.DE
XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and DXSE.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Xtrackers - XDWH.DE tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD while DXSE.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE returned 7.61%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for DXSE.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWH.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DXSE.DE.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDWH.DE having a -1.98% return and DXSE.DE slightly higher at -1.95%. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE has outperformed DXSE.DE with an annualized return of 7.61%, while DXSE.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.10% annualized return.
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
DXSE.DE
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
XDWH.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
DXSE.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -1.95% | 4.97% | 4.52% | 9.56% | -5.75% | 25.75% | -1.94% | 32.90% | -1.01% | 4.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and DXSE.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2016 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XDWH.DE and DXSE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.DE vs. DXSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.DE
DXSE.DE
XDWH.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWH.DE | DXSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.06 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.38 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 0.82 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWH.DE | DXSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.27 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.32 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.38 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.45 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, smaller than the maximum DXSE.DE drawdown of -34.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and DXSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.DE | DXSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -34.30% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -12.67% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -28.10% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -28.10% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.08% | -28.10% | +2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -13.88% | +5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -8.34% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 5.81% | -1.61% |
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) is 4.81%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that XDWH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.DE | DXSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 5.82% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 11.95% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 17.63% | -3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 16.48% | -3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 16.04% | -1.35% |
XDWH.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DXSE.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. DXSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor DXSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.DE and DXSE.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXSE.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while DXSE.DE tracks MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.DE and 0.17% for DXSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and DXSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer