XDWH.DE vs. 2B70.DE
XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and 2B70.DE (iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XDWH.DE tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD while 2B70.DE tracks the Nasdaq Biotechnology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDWH.DE returned 5.50%/yr vs 5.68%/yr for 2B70.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWH.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for 2B70.DE.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. 2B70.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.DE achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly lower than 2B70.DE's 4.53% return.
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
2B70.DE
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 39.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE vs. 2B70.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 0.92% |
2B70.DE iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF | 4.53% | 18.62% | 4.60% | 2.56% | -6.29% | 7.59% | 14.52% | 30.18% | -7.35% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and 2B70.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between XDWH.DE and 2B70.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.DE vs. 2B70.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.DE
2B70.DE
XDWH.DE vs. 2B70.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (2B70.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWH.DE | 2B70.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.34 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 6.15 | -5.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 17.06 | -14.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWH.DE | 2B70.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.04 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.28 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.36 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. 2B70.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, smaller than the maximum 2B70.DE drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and 2B70.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.DE | 2B70.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -30.87% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -6.33% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -29.34% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -30.87% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -1.26% | -7.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -10.01% | +5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 2.29% | +1.91% |
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. 2B70.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) is 4.81%, while iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (2B70.DE) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that XDWH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B70.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.DE | 2B70.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 6.65% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 14.26% | -4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 19.09% | -5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 20.34% | -6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 21.76% | -7.07% |
XDWH.DE vs. 2B70.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWH.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B70.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. 2B70.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor 2B70.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.DE and 2B70.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for 2B70.DE.
XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while 2B70.DE tracks Nasdaq Biotechnology. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWH.DE and 0.35% for 2B70.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and 2B70.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer