PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWF.DE achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than LBNK.DE's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWF.DE has underperformed LBNK.DE with an annualized return of 11.89%, while LBNK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.


XDWF.DE

1D
2.02%
1M
1.21%
YTD
1.15%
6M
4.65%
1Y
12.74%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
11.89%

LBNK.DE

1D
0.67%
1M
2.51%
YTD
7.56%
6M
15.54%
1Y
40.00%
3Y*
42.34%
5Y*
27.76%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWF.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C
1.15%15.35%34.08%12.42%-4.87%39.49%-11.91%29.11%-13.92%8.33%
LBNK.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc
7.56%76.66%32.67%26.48%1.30%37.71%-24.17%14.90%-25.93%11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWF.DE and LBNK.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.74

The correlation between XDWF.DE and LBNK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWF.DE
XDWF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XDWF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LBNK.DE
LBNK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBNK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWF.DELBNK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.31

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.60

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.98

8.86

-4.88

XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the LBNK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWF.DE and LBNK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWF.DELBNK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.86

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.20

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.57

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.06

+0.57

Drawdowns

XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.06%, smaller than the maximum LBNK.DE drawdown of -81.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWF.DE and LBNK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWF.DELBNK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.06%

-81.84%

+39.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-15.83%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

-20.26%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.74%

-27.82%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.06%

-56.08%

+14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.13%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-53.20%

+47.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.65%

-1.51%

Volatility

XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) is 3.37%, while Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LBNK.DE) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that XDWF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBNK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWF.DELBNK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

5.68%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

18.02%

-7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

22.10%

-8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

22.90%

-6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

25.34%

-6.73%

XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWF.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LBNK.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWF.DE vs. LBNK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWF.DE nor LBNK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWF.DE and LBNK.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWF.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWF.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LBNK.DE.

XDWF.DE tracks MSCI World Financials, while LBNK.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWF.DE and 0.30% for LBNK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWF.DE and LBNK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer