XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

XDWE.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C) and XS2D.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWE.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while XS2D.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWE.L returned 11.21%/yr vs 23.29%/yr for XS2D.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWE.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XS2D.L.

Performance

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDWE.L is traded in GBp, while XS2D.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XS2D.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWE.L achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 17.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWE.L has underperformed XS2D.L with an annualized return of 11.21%, while XS2D.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.29% annualized return.

XDWE.L

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -0.05%
• 6M: 8.14%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 1Y: 17.39%
• 3Y*: 12.49%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: 11.21%

XS2D.L

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -1.25%
• 6M: 16.31%
• YTD: 17.14%
• 1Y: 37.73%
• 3Y*: 32.04%
• 5Y*: 19.19%
• 10Y*: 23.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDWE.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C	11.09%	3.94%	14.06%	7.78%	-1.34%	31.37%	7.89%	23.88%	-3.60%	7.83%
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C	17.14%	17.56%	48.20%	41.43%	-31.85%	64.57%	17.41%	56.67%	-10.94%	31.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWE.L and XS2D.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014	0.81

The correlation between XDWE.L and XS2D.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDWE.L	XS2D.L
Technology	20.9%	56.8%
Industrials	14.2%	5.9%
Financial Services	13.9%	6.0%
Healthcare	11.1%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	0.0%
Real Estate	6.1%	2.4%
Utilities	5.7%	4.9%
Energy	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	3.9%	2.2%
Communication Services	3.9%	6.6%

Return for Risk

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWE.L

XDWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XDWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XDWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XDWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XDWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

XS2D.L

XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDWE.L	XS2D.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.59	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.27	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.28	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	2.38	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.79	8.62	+1.16

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWE.L and XS2D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWE.L drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, which is greater than XS2D.L's maximum drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWE.L and XS2D.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDWE.L	XS2D.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.55%	-54.44%	-44.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.64%	-15.77%	+10.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.89%	-36.46%	+16.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.89%	-37.20%	+17.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.08%	-54.44%	+23.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-2.41%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-8.12%	+3.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	4.36%	-2.59%

Volatility

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) is 2.73%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that XDWE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDWE.L	XS2D.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	5.47%	-2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.79%	17.88%	-11.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.66%	23.63%	-13.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.53%	30.26%	-10.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.60%	31.29%	-12.69%

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDWE.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWE.L nor XS2D.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDWE.L and XS2D.L in my portfolio?

XDWE.L and XS2D.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDWE.L or XS2D.L?

On fees, XDWE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDWE.L or XS2D.L?

XDWE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.

What is the main difference between XDWE.L and XS2D.L?

XDWE.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XS2D.L is Leveraged Equities. XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDWE.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.