XDWE.L vs. XDPP.L
XDWE.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C) and XDPP.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C) are both S&P 500 funds from Xtrackers - XDWE.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index while XDPP.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDWE.L returned 12.24%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for XDPP.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWE.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XDPP.L.
Performance
XDWE.L vs. XDPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDWE.L is traded in GBp, while XDPP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XDPP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWE.L achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than XDPP.L's 10.57% return.
XDWE.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
XDPP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWE.L vs. XDPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWE.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C | 9.58% | 3.94% | 14.06% | 7.78% | 5.69% |
XDPP.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C | 10.57% | 9.44% | 27.26% | 19.81% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWE.L and XDPP.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between XDWE.L and XDPP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWE.L vs. XDPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWE.L
XDPP.L
XDWE.L vs. XDPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWE.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.52 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.99 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | 14.32 | -2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWE.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.78 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.25 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
XDWE.L vs. XDPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.08%, which is greater than XDPP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWE.L and XDPP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWE.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -20.98% | -10.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.64% | -7.28% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -20.98% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.24% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -3.49% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 2.03% | -0.26% |
Volatility
XDWE.L vs. XDPP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) is 2.03%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that XDWE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWE.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 2.62% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.45% | 7.13% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.64% | 10.46% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 13.89% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 13.89% | +2.20% |
XDWE.L vs. XDPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDPP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWE.L vs. XDPP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWE.L nor XDPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWE.L and XDPP.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDPP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDPP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDWE.L.
XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while XDPP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDWE.L and 0.06% for XDPP.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWE.L and XDPP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer