PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWE.L achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 16.79% return.


XDWE.L

1D
0.42%
1M
4.78%
YTD
9.58%
6M
9.98%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
12.33%

PQVG.L

1D
0.36%
1M
5.36%
YTD
16.79%
6M
17.07%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
9.58%3.94%14.06%7.78%-1.34%31.37%7.89%23.88%-3.69%8.21%
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
16.79%5.84%32.29%0.98%12.54%27.78%4.44%21.16%-1.98%14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWE.L and PQVG.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.84

The correlation between XDWE.L and PQVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWE.L
PQVG.L

Technology

18.3%
24.3%

Industrials

14.7%
15.6%

Financial Services

14.4%
21.8%

Healthcare

10.9%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
5.6%

Real Estate

6.2%

-

Utilities

6.1%
0.8%

Energy

4.6%
5.6%

Basic Materials

4.1%
2.2%

Communication Services

4.0%
10.4%

Technology

XDWE.L
18.3%
PQVG.L
24.3%

Industrials

XDWE.L
14.7%
PQVG.L
15.6%

Financial Services

XDWE.L
14.4%
PQVG.L
21.8%

Healthcare

XDWE.L
10.9%
PQVG.L
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XDWE.L
10.3%
PQVG.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

XDWE.L
6.5%
PQVG.L
5.6%

Real Estate

XDWE.L
6.2%
PQVG.L

-

Utilities

XDWE.L
6.1%
PQVG.L
0.8%

Energy

XDWE.L
4.6%
PQVG.L
5.6%

Basic Materials

XDWE.L
4.1%
PQVG.L
2.2%

Communication Services

XDWE.L
4.0%
PQVG.L
10.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWE.L
XDWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PQVG.L
PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWE.LPQVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

5.82

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

17.49

-5.66

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWE.L and PQVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWE.LPQVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.31

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.12

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.89

-0.13

Drawdowns

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.08%, which is greater than PQVG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWE.L and PQVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWE.LPQVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.08%

-25.88%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-4.11%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-17.44%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.67%

-17.44%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-4.17%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.37%

+0.40%

Volatility

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) is 2.03%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that XDWE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWE.LPQVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

2.79%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

7.88%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.64%

10.37%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

14.89%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

16.24%

-0.15%

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDWE.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison

XDWE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
0.77%0.82%0.82%1.61%1.77%0.87%1.59%1.41%1.30%0.72%
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWE.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDWE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.

XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XDWE.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWE.L and PQVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer