XDWD.DE vs. XNDX.DE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XDWD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C) and XNDX.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWD.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World, while XNDX.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWD.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XNDX.DE.

Performance

XDWD.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWD.DE achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than XNDX.DE's 20.03% return.

XDWD.DE

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 6M: 11.40%
• 1Y: 24.83%
• 3Y*: 18.00%
• 5Y*: 12.28%
• 10Y*: 13.29%

XNDX.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 20.03%
• 6M: 20.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWD.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C	11.11%	10.28%
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD	20.03%	-4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWD.DE and XNDX.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

XDWD.DE vs. XNDX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWD.DE

XDWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 81
XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XDWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XDWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
XDWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XDWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

XNDX.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWD.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XDWD.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.65	—	—

Drawdowns

XDWD.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, which is greater than XNDX.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWD.DE and XNDX.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDWD.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.55%	-20.10%	-13.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-1.85%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.53%	-10.09%	+5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDWD.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.89%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.27%	31.28%	-20.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.15%	31.28%	-17.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.12%	31.28%	-16.16%

XDWD.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWD.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XNDX.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDWD.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDWD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XNDX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDWD.DE and XNDX.DE in my portfolio?

XDWD.DE and XNDX.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDWD.DE or XNDX.DE?

On fees, XNDX.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDWD.DE or XNDX.DE?

XNDX.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XDWD.DE.

What is the main difference between XDWD.DE and XNDX.DE?

XDWD.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XNDX.DE is Nasdaq-100. XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World, while XNDX.DE tracks Nasdaq 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XDWD.DE and 0.18% for XNDX.DE.