PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWD.DE achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly lower than WEBN.DE's 12.37% return.


XDWD.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.72%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.37%
1Y
23.85%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.83%

WEBN.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.95%
YTD
12.37%
6M
13.19%
1Y
26.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XDWD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
10.91%7.85%9.25%
WEBN.DE
Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
12.37%9.70%8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWD.DE and WEBN.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024

0.94

The correlation between XDWD.DE and WEBN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWD.DE
XDWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

WEBN.DE
WEBN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WEBN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWD.DEWEBN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

4.03

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.44

16.67

-2.23

XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the WEBN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWD.DE and WEBN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWD.DEWEBN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.28

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.08

-0.29

Drawdowns

XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, which is greater than WEBN.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWD.DE and WEBN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWD.DEWEBN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.55%

-21.22%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-6.63%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.65%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-3.11%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.61%

+0.04%

Volatility

XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) is 2.60%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that XDWD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEBN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWD.DEWEBN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

3.05%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

8.43%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

11.74%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

14.90%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

14.90%

+0.26%

XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWD.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBN.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWD.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWD.DE nor WEBN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XDWD.DE and WEBN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WEBN.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WEBN.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XDWD.DE.

XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World, while WEBN.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XDWD.DE and 0.07% for WEBN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWD.DE and WEBN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer