PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWD.DE achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly higher than LYQ2.DE's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWD.DE has outperformed LYQ2.DE with an annualized return of 13.12%, while LYQ2.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.12% annualized return.


XDWD.DE

1D
1.14%
1M
2.64%
YTD
11.26%
6M
12.63%
1Y
25.29%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
13.12%

LYQ2.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.39%
1Y
0.98%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
0.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
11.26%7.85%25.98%20.19%-13.68%32.75%5.47%31.26%-4.94%7.84%
LYQ2.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.21%2.14%2.97%3.27%-4.97%-0.84%-0.20%-0.13%-0.45%-0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWD.DE and LYQ2.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.09

The correlation between XDWD.DE and LYQ2.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (10 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWD.DE
XDWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

LYQ2.DE
LYQ2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
LYQ2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQ2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQ2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQ2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQ2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDWD.DELYQ2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.15

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

0.80

+3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.92

2.44

+13.48

XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the LYQ2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWD.DE and LYQ2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, which is greater than LYQ2.DE's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWD.DE and LYQ2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWD.DELYQ2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.55%

-7.75%

-25.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-1.22%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

-1.22%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-6.02%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.55%

-7.75%

-25.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.37%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-1.28%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.40%

+1.18%

Volatility

XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to Amundi Euro Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ2.DE) at 0.52%. This indicates that XDWD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYQ2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWD.DELYQ2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

0.52%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

1.17%

+6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

1.28%

+10.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

1.66%

+12.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

1.32%

+13.83%

XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWD.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LYQ2.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWD.DE vs. LYQ2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWD.DE nor LYQ2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWD.DE and LYQ2.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYQ2.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYQ2.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XDWD.DE.

XDWD.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while LYQ2.DE is European Government Bonds. XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World, while LYQ2.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 1-3 Year Bond. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XDWD.DE and 0.17% for LYQ2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWD.DE and LYQ2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer