PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDW0.L is traded in USD, while XXTW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XXTW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly higher than XXTW.L's 24.17% return.


XDW0.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
30.91%
6M
28.80%
1Y
47.41%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
9.43%

XXTW.L

1D
-1.82%
1M
14.17%
YTD
24.17%
6M
23.85%
1Y
51.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
30.91%14.66%2.10%-1.04%
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
24.17%22.41%33.94%14.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.L and XXTW.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.06

The correlation between XDW0.L and XXTW.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDW0.LXXTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

3.05

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

9.33

+3.65

XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.L and XXTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDW0.LXXTW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.58

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.61

-1.21

Drawdowns

XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than XXTW.L's maximum drawdown of -26.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and XXTW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDW0.LXXTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-26.61%

-37.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-16.84%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-2.61%

-3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-4.09%

-8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

5.51%

-1.87%

Volatility

XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) at 6.79%. This indicates that XDW0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XXTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDW0.LXXTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

6.79%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

15.19%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.23%

19.87%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

22.00%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.16%

22.00%

+4.16%

XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDW0.L and XXTW.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDW0.L vs. XXTW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDW0.L nor XXTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDW0.L and XXTW.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDW0.L and XXTW.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDW0.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while XXTW.L is Technology Equities. XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDW0.L and XXTW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer