XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L
XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Xtrackers and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L returned 9.43%/yr vs 9.35%/yr for XLEP.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDW0.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLEP.L.
Performance
XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDW0.L is traded in USD, while XLEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLEP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDW0.L having a 30.91% return and XLEP.L slightly higher at 31.09%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDW0.L having a 9.43% annualized return and XLEP.L not far behind at 9.35%.
XDW0.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 30.91%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- 1Y
- 47.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 31.09%
- 6M
- 29.31%
- 1Y
- 45.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 30.91% | 14.66% | 2.10% | 3.69% | 46.28% | 39.22% | -30.39% | 10.05% | -15.68% | 5.34% |
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.09% | 9.06% | 3.10% | -0.06% | 62.03% | 52.43% | -33.02% | 10.08% | -18.54% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.L and XLEP.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016 | 0.94 |
The correlation between XDW0.L and XLEP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDW0.L
XLEP.L
Energy
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XDW0.L
XLEP.L
Communication Services
XDW0.L
XLEP.L
-
Basic Materials
XDW0.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDW0.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDW0.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Financial Services
XDW0.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Healthcare
XDW0.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Industrials
XDW0.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Real Estate
XDW0.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Technology
XDW0.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Utilities
XDW0.L
-
XLEP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDW0.L
XLEP.L
XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDW0.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 3.24 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 10.35 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDW0.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.03 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.74 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.16 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, smaller than the maximum XLEP.L drawdown of -72.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and XLEP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDW0.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.72% | -72.31% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -14.11% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -21.12% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -28.27% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.72% | -67.80% | +4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -6.43% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -22.81% | +10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 4.43% | -0.79% |
Volatility
XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) is 7.38%, while Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that XDW0.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDW0.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 8.57% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 19.38% | -3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 22.67% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.24% | 26.87% | -2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 28.91% | -2.75% |
XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDW0.L vs. XLEP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDW0.L nor XLEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XDW0.L and XLEP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLEP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLEP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.L and 0.14% for XLEP.L.
Find the right allocation for XDW0.L and XLEP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer