XDW0.L vs. WNDG.L
XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and WNDG.L (Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Energy Equities funds - XDW0.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while WNDG.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDW0.L returned 18.78%/yr vs 2.23%/yr for WNDG.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDW0.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WNDG.L.
Performance
XDW0.L vs. WNDG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDW0.L is traded in USD, while WNDG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WNDG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly higher than WNDG.L's 16.48% return.
XDW0.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 30.91%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- 1Y
- 47.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
WNDG.L
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- YTD
- 16.48%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 42.14%
- 3Y*
- 2.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDW0.L vs. WNDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 30.91% | 14.66% | 2.10% | 3.69% | 19.93% |
WNDG.L Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 16.48% | 32.85% | -20.11% | -19.80% | -14.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.L and WNDG.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XDW0.L and WNDG.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDW0.L vs. WNDG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDW0.L
WNDG.L
XDW0.L vs. WNDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WNDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDW0.L | WNDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 4.42 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 14.23 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDW0.L | WNDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.03 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | -0.16 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
XDW0.L vs. WNDG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than WNDG.L's maximum drawdown of -52.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and WNDG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDW0.L | WNDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.72% | -52.89% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -9.50% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -38.15% | +19.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -18.41% | +12.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -30.43% | +18.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 2.95% | +0.69% |
Volatility
XDW0.L vs. WNDG.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WNDG.L) at 5.87%. This indicates that XDW0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDW0.L | WNDG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 5.87% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 14.84% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 20.67% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.24% | 23.07% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 23.07% | +3.09% |
XDW0.L vs. WNDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WNDG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDW0.L vs. WNDG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDW0.L nor WNDG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDW0.L and WNDG.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDW0.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDW0.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WNDG.L.
XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while WNDG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.L and 0.50% for WNDG.L.
Find the right allocation for XDW0.L and WNDG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer