XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L
XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and SPOG.L (iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Xtrackers and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L returned 9.43%/yr vs 7.22%/yr for SPOG.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDW0.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for SPOG.L.
Performance
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDW0.L is traded in USD, while SPOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPOG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPOG.L's 28.56% return. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L has outperformed SPOG.L with an annualized return of 9.43%, while SPOG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.22% annualized return.
XDW0.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 30.91%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- 1Y
- 47.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
SPOG.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 28.56%
- 6M
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 38.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 30.91% | 14.66% | 2.10% | 3.69% | 46.28% | 39.22% | -30.39% | 10.05% | -15.68% | 5.34% |
SPOG.L iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 28.56% | 6.60% | -1.10% | 2.22% | 37.90% | 67.83% | -31.90% | 8.95% | -21.78% | -4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.L and SPOG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between XDW0.L and SPOG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDW0.L
SPOG.L
Energy
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XDW0.L
SPOG.L
Communication Services
XDW0.L
SPOG.L
-
Basic Materials
XDW0.L
-
SPOG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDW0.L
-
SPOG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDW0.L
-
SPOG.L
-
Financial Services
XDW0.L
-
SPOG.L
-
Healthcare
XDW0.L
-
SPOG.L
-
Industrials
XDW0.L
-
SPOG.L
-
Real Estate
XDW0.L
-
SPOG.L
-
Technology
XDW0.L
-
SPOG.L
-
Utilities
XDW0.L
-
SPOG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDW0.L
SPOG.L
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDW0.L | SPOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.25 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 2.53 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 6.52 | +6.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDW0.L | SPOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 1.45 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.54 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.22 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.11 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, smaller than the maximum SPOG.L drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and SPOG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDW0.L | SPOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.72% | -83.96% | +20.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -15.11% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -27.79% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -32.31% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.72% | -74.91% | +11.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -8.40% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -34.83% | +22.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 5.87% | -2.23% |
Volatility
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) is 7.38%, while iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that XDW0.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDW0.L | SPOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 9.12% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 22.41% | -6.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 26.36% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.24% | 30.35% | -6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 32.90% | -6.74% |
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDW0.L nor SPOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDW0.L and SPOG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDW0.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDW0.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPOG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.L and 0.55% for SPOG.L.
Find the right allocation for XDW0.L and SPOG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer