PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDW0.L is traded in USD, while SPOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPOG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPOG.L's 28.56% return. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L has outperformed SPOG.L with an annualized return of 9.43%, while SPOG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.22% annualized return.


XDW0.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
30.91%
6M
28.80%
1Y
47.41%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
9.43%

SPOG.L

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
28.56%
6M
23.35%
1Y
38.41%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
7.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
30.91%14.66%2.10%3.69%46.28%39.22%-30.39%10.05%-15.68%5.34%
SPOG.L
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF
28.56%6.60%-1.10%2.22%37.90%67.83%-31.90%8.95%-21.78%-4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.L and SPOG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016

0.90

The correlation between XDW0.L and SPOG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDW0.L
SPOG.L

Energy

99.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XDW0.L
99.9%
SPOG.L
100.0%

Communication Services

XDW0.L
0.1%
SPOG.L

-

Basic Materials

XDW0.L

-

SPOG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDW0.L

-

SPOG.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XDW0.L

-

SPOG.L

-

Financial Services

XDW0.L

-

SPOG.L

-

Healthcare

XDW0.L

-

SPOG.L

-

Industrials

XDW0.L

-

SPOG.L

-

Real Estate

XDW0.L

-

SPOG.L

-

Technology

XDW0.L

-

SPOG.L

-

Utilities

XDW0.L

-

SPOG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOG.L
SPOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDW0.LSPOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

2.53

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

6.52

+6.46

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the SPOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.L and SPOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDW0.LSPOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.45

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.54

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.22

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.11

+0.28

Drawdowns

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, smaller than the maximum SPOG.L drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and SPOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDW0.LSPOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-83.96%

+20.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-15.11%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-27.79%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

-32.31%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.72%

-74.91%

+11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-8.40%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-34.83%

+22.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

5.87%

-2.23%

Volatility

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) is 7.38%, while iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (SPOG.L) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that XDW0.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDW0.LSPOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

9.12%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

22.41%

-6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.23%

26.36%

-7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

30.35%

-6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.16%

32.90%

-6.74%

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDW0.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDW0.L vs. SPOG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDW0.L nor SPOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDW0.L and SPOG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDW0.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDW0.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SPOG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.L and 0.55% for SPOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDW0.L and SPOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer