XDW0.L vs. GCED.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and GCED.L (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist) are both Energy Equities funds - XDW0.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while GCED.L tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDW0.L returned 19.19%/yr vs -4.51%/yr for GCED.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDW0.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCED.L.

Performance

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly lower than GCED.L's 35.99% return.

XDW0.L

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 30.91%
• 6M: 28.80%
• 1Y: 47.41%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 19.19%
• 10Y*: 9.43%

GCED.L

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 2.39%
• YTD: 35.99%
• 6M: 37.39%
• 1Y: 86.86%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C	30.91%	14.66%	2.10%	3.69%	46.28%	15.27%
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist	35.99%	41.92%	-26.55%	-10.54%	-30.72%	-22.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.L and GCED.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021	0.34

The correlation between XDW0.L and GCED.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDW0.L	GCED.L
Energy	99.9%	13.0%
Communication Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.9%
Financial Services	-	0.9%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	48.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	6.8%
Utilities	-	16.2%

Return for Risk

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.L

XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

GCED.L

GCED.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
GCED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GCED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GCED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GCED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GCED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDW0.L	GCED.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	3.78	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	4.51	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.58	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	7.61	-3.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.98	25.61	-12.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is lower than the GCED.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.L and GCED.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDW0.L	GCED.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	3.78	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	-0.16	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	-0.25	+0.64

Drawdowns

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, smaller than the maximum GCED.L drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and GCED.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDW0.L	GCED.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.72%	-72.10%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.14%	-11.35%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-53.20%	+34.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.47%	-69.88%	+43.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.03%	-31.99%	+25.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.31%	-44.83%	+32.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	3.38%	+0.26%

Volatility

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) is 7.38%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that XDW0.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCED.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDW0.L	GCED.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.38%	9.12%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.33%	16.01%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.23%	22.89%	-3.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.24%	28.32%	-4.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.16%	28.87%	-2.71%

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDW0.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GCED.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDW0.L vs. GCED.L - Dividend Comparison

XDW0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist	1.53%	2.09%	1.43%	0.68%	0.09%	0.20%
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDW0.L and GCED.L in my portfolio?

XDW0.L and GCED.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDW0.L or GCED.L?

On fees, XDW0.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDW0.L or GCED.L?

XDW0.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCED.L.

What is the main difference between XDW0.L and GCED.L?

XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while GCED.L tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.L and 0.60% for GCED.L.