PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) is Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while ENGI.PA (ENGIE SA) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L returned 9.55%/yr vs 14.45%/yr for ENGI.PA. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and ENGIE SA (ENGI.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDW0.L is traded in USD, while ENGI.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENGI.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 28.94% return, which is significantly higher than ENGI.PA's 26.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L has underperformed ENGI.PA with an annualized return of 9.55%, while ENGI.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.45% annualized return.

XDW0.L

1D
-0.77%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
28.94%
6M
29.39%
1Y
36.83%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
18.57%
10Y*
9.55%

ENGI.PA

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
26.99%
6M
31.21%
1Y
45.56%
3Y*
37.58%
5Y*
25.85%
10Y*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C		28.94%14.66%2.11%3.68%46.28%39.22%-30.39%10.05%-15.00%4.49%
ENGI.PA
ENGIE SA		26.99%80.31%-1.09%34.91%4.06%0.90%-5.36%15.85%-12.11%43.57%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.L and ENGI.PA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between XDW0.L and ENGI.PA has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C

ENGIE SA

Often compared with XDW0.L:
XDW0.L vs. XIN.TOXDW0.L vs. XDWT.LXDW0.L vs. VOOXDW0.L vs. ENGW.LXDW0.L vs. HAPXDW0.L vs. DBCXDW0.L vs. CWEU.L
Often compared with ENGI.PA:
ENGI.PA vs. HSBK.LENGI.PA vs. IBE.MCENGI.PA vs. TTEENGI.PA vs. OTTRENGI.PA vs. TTE.LENGI.PA vs. NEEENGI.PA vs. TSM

Return for Risk

XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
ENGI.PA
ENGI.PA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ENGI.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENGI.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENGI.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ENGI.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENGI.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and ENGIE SA (ENGI.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XDW0.LENGI.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.01
2.12

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.57
2.86

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.22

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

8.05

+2.13

XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the ENGI.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.L and ENGI.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -68.41%, smaller than the maximum ENGI.PA drawdown of -72.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and ENGI.PA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDW0.LENGI.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.41%

-72.82%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-14.40%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.89%

-17.91%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

-34.17%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.72%

-47.76%

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.45%

-4.05%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.56%

-46.20%

+27.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

5.79%

-1.98%

Volatility

XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to ENGIE SA (ENGI.PA) at 5.33%. This indicates that XDW0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENGI.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDW0.LENGI.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

5.33%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.44%

17.99%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

21.95%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.22%

23.90%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.14%

25.09%

+1.05%

Dividends

XDW0.L vs. ENGI.PA - Dividend Comparison

XDW0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENGI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENGI.PA
ENGIE SA		4.91%6.60%9.34%8.79%6.35%4.07%0.00%2.57%5.75%5.93%8.25%6.12%
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDW0.L and ENGI.PA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDW0.L and ENGI.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer