XDW0.L vs. AUM5.DE
XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and AUM5.DE (Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - XDW0.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while AUM5.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L returned 9.43%/yr vs 15.37%/yr for AUM5.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDW0.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AUM5.DE.
Performance
XDW0.L vs. AUM5.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDW0.L is traded in USD, while AUM5.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AUM5.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.L achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly higher than AUM5.DE's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.L has underperformed AUM5.DE with an annualized return of 9.43%, while AUM5.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.37% annualized return.
XDW0.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 30.91%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- 1Y
- 47.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
AUM5.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 27.82%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- 15.37%
XDW0.L vs. AUM5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 30.91% | 14.66% | 2.10% | 3.69% | 46.28% | 39.22% | -30.39% | 10.05% | -15.68% | 5.34% |
AUM5.DE Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR | 10.10% | 18.31% | 24.82% | 26.52% | -18.87% | 29.85% | 17.57% | 32.09% | -5.66% | 21.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.L and AUM5.DE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016 | 0.43 |
The correlation between XDW0.L and AUM5.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDW0.L vs. AUM5.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDW0.L
AUM5.DE
XDW0.L vs. AUM5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDW0.L | AUM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 3.23 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 13.71 | -0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDW0.L | AUM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.38 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.86 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.94 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.92 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
XDW0.L vs. AUM5.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.L drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than AUM5.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.L and AUM5.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDW0.L | AUM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.72% | -34.13% | -29.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -8.58% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -19.45% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -24.23% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.72% | -34.13% | -29.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -0.62% | -5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -3.72% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 2.02% | +1.62% |
Volatility
XDW0.L vs. AUM5.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE) at 2.82%. This indicates that XDW0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUM5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDW0.L | AUM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 2.82% | +4.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 8.15% | +8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 11.63% | +7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.24% | 15.91% | +8.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 16.32% | +9.84% |
XDW0.L vs. AUM5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AUM5.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDW0.L vs. AUM5.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDW0.L nor AUM5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDW0.L and AUM5.DE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUM5.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUM5.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.L.
XDW0.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while AUM5.DE is S&P 500. XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while AUM5.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.L and 0.15% for AUM5.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDW0.L and AUM5.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer